20190225 CNBC Squawk on the Street on how to enforce a trade deal

Summary: This morning I got to talk with Squawk anchors Morgan, David, and Carl about today’s announcement that there will be no tariff hike next week. As I wrote earlier, I believe that a deal will be announced this week. Announcing a deal is easy; enforcing it is hard. But this is an important positive for global markets. You can see the interview by clicking on this link.

As you know, I send talking points to the producers before every show so the anchors know w hat is likely to come out of my mouth. I have copied today’s point below, typos and all.

Rutledge talking points

  • I believe there will be a trade deal this week. March 1 deadline will go away. 
  • I gave a private briefing to the Cabinet, including the whole trade team, in the White House a few weeks ago.
    • Briefed them on the China economy—very weak.
    • Cause of weakness is not the tariffs.
    • Slowdown caused by a severe credit crunch for the private companies that account for 70% of jobs.
    • Credit crunch caused by the collapse of shadow banking industry and peer-to-peer lending.
    • Slowdown has spread to Japan, Taiwan, S. Korea, and Germany due to linked supply chains.
    • I believe both sides ready to make a deal.
    • Elements of a deal that would work include:
      • China agrees to buy a bunch of US stuff (soybeans, steel, …..) This is easy to do.
      • We both agree to take down the tariffs.
      • China agrees to step up IP protection efforts
        • They already have a new law going into effect. 
        • They already have imposed stiffer penalties for stealing technology
        • There is major pressure in China to protect THEIR IP as well. (Think Alibaba)
        • The big issue? Huawei/ZTE/G5. Thats where we need real dialog.
      • You will never get them to stop subsidizing SOEs.
      • They will never agree to reverse their ‘industrial policy’. It is the key to their going from a low-margin assembler of our products to a producer of their own high-value products.
      • US arguments over manipulating their currency make no sense at all. The RMB is still not convertible, i.e., Chinese citizens are still not freely allowed to own foreign assets including dollars.
      • They have been propping the RMB up, not pushing it down. Chinese leaders are deathly afraid of capital outflows. They would welcome a joint statement about stable currency values because it would discourage investors from pulling capital out. 
    • I believe the final deal will look a lot like the above

JR

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • MisterWong
  • Y!GG
  • Webnews
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
This entry was posted in All. Bookmark the permalink.